RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

discuss bbc micro and electron emulators (including mame) here!
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

Figured i should split this off the Pi version thread.

Code is here https://github.com/kilograham/b-em

just updated with support for 1080p 50hz VGA output which some monitors may like better than 1280x1024 50hz
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

I've just also realised that 297Mhz might be pushing the flash a bit hard, so let me know if it works for you (it did for me)... slowing the flash down by a factor of 2 may make things too slow, i'll have to take a look.
nicolagiacobbe
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:40 am
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by nicolagiacobbe »

Excuse me but what makes you think you are pushing too much the flash? Have you find any abnormal behaviour that could be caused by flash stressing? I am interested in finding the overdriving limits of the Pico.
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

It is a question of what external flash chip you have.

The flash chip on the Pico is rated at max 133Mhz; the default flash clock divider is 2, so that means anything over 266Mhz system clock is over spec for the flash chip unless you sub-divide it further. I need to try it out on some of my boards to see; on the one i was using it works fine, but i've heard some people have had issues above about 280Mhz with the default clock divider.
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

Just trying to build on the RP2040 version on my Pi (Stretch) but CMake seems to be an old one:

Code: Select all

pi@raspberrypi:~/PiPico/pico_build $ sudo apt install cmake
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
cmake is already the newest version (3.7.2-1).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
pi@raspberrypi:~/PiPico/pico_build $ 

Code: Select all

pi@raspberrypi:~/PiPico/pico_build $ cmake -DPICO_SDK_PATH=/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk -DPICO_BOARD=vgaboard ../b-em
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:1 (cmake_minimum_required):
  CMake 3.13 or higher is required.  You are running version 3.7.2


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
So I guess there is a later version from somewhere?

Update...

Currently looking in https://cmake.org/files/v3.13/

Getting closer...

Code: Select all

pi@raspberrypi:~/PiPico/pico_build $ cmake -DPICO_SDK_PATH=/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk -DPICO_BOARD=vgaboard ../b-em
Building b-em for generic host mode using the Pico SDK
PICO_SDK_PATH is /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk
Defaulting PICO_PLATFORM to rp2040 since not specified.
Defaulting PICO platform compiler to pico_arm_gcc since not specified.
-- Defaulting build type to 'Release' since not specified.
PICO compiler is pico_arm_gcc
Defaulting PICO_EXTRAS_PATH as sibling of PICO_SDK_PATH: /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/../pico-extras
PICO_GCC_TRIPLE defaulted to arm-none-eabi
CMake Error at /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/cmake/preload/toolchains/find_compiler.cmake:28 (message):
  Compiler 'arm-none-eabi-gcc' not found, you can specify search path with
  "PICO_TOOLCHAIN_PATH".
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/cmake/preload/toolchains/pico_arm_gcc.cmake:20 (pico_find_compiler)
  /usr/local/share/cmake-3.13/Modules/CMakeDetermineSystem.cmake:94 (include)
  /home/pi/PiPico/pico-extras/CMakeLists.txt:9 (project)


CMake Error: CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Unix Makefiles".  CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM is not set.  You probably need to select a different build tool.
CMake Error: CMAKE_C_COMPILER not set, after EnableLanguage
CMake Error: CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER not set, after EnableLanguage
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
Just need to work out which gcc to install now?

Update ...

Looking at https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-sof ... /downloads
Downloaded gcc-arm-none-eabi-10-2020-q4-major-src.tar.bz2
Needed ...
sudo apt-get install p7zip-full
./install-sources.sh
sudo apt-get install m4
./build-prerequisites.sh

... Close but not yet

Code: Select all

+2021-03-09:21:02:19 (/home/pi/arm-gcc/gcc-arm-none-eabi-10-2020-q4-major/build-common.sh:56): copy_dir_clean(): tar xf -
+2021-03-09:21:02:19 (/home/pi/arm-gcc/gcc-arm-none-eabi-10-2020-q4-major/build-common.sh:57): copy_dir_clean(): set -u
+2021-03-09:21:02:19 (./build-prerequisites.sh:265): main(): pushd /home/pi/arm-gcc/gcc-arm-none-eabi-10-2020-q4-major/build-mingw/zlib
~/arm-gcc/gcc-arm-none-eabi-10-2020-q4-major/build-mingw/zlib ~/arm-gcc/gcc-arm-none-eabi-10-2020-q4-major/src
+2021-03-09:21:02:19 (./build-prerequisites.sh:267): main(): ./configure --static --prefix=/home/pi/arm-gcc/gcc-arm-none-eabi-10-2020-q4-major/build-mingw/host-libs/zlib
Compiler error reporting is too harsh for ./configure (perhaps remove -Werror).
** ./configure aborting.

... Looking for aarch32 pre-built package instead
https://github.com/xpack-dev-tools/arm- ... arm.tar.gz


cmake now seems to do it's thing

Code: Select all

pi@raspberrypi:~/PiPico/pico_build $ cmake -DPICO_SDK_PATH=/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk -DPICO_TOOLCHAIN_PATH=/home/pi/arm-gcc/arm-none-eabi -DPICO_BOARD=vgaboard -DUSE_USB_KEYBOARD=TRUE ../b-em
Building b-em for RP2040 using the Pico SDK
PICO_SDK_PATH is /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk
PICO platform is rp2040.
PICO compiler is 
PICO_GCC_TRIPLE defaulted to arm-none-eabi
PICO target board is vgaboard.
Using board configuration from /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/src/boards/include/boards/vgaboard.h
TinyUSB available at /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/lib/tinyusb/src/portable/raspberrypi/rp2040; adding USB support.
-- Could NOT find Doxygen (missing: DOXYGEN_EXECUTABLE) 
PIOASM will need to be built
lwIP available at /home/pi/PiPico/pico-extras/lib/lwip/src/core/tcp.c; TCP/IP support is available.
PICO_GCC_TRIPLE defaulted to arm-none-eabi
Skipping b-em for Pico SDK build
Skipping b-em-reduced for Pico SDK build
Skipping b-em-reduced-thumb-cpu for Pico SDK build
{$NAME} DISCS=discs/beeb_discs.txt ROMS=roms/beeb_roms.txt
Configured beeb TUBE=0 DEBUGGER=0 SID= PICO_CPU=1 GUI= SAVE= VDFS=0 FDI= UEF= CSW= IDE= SCSI= ADC= MOUSE= MUSIC5000= I8271=
ELF2UF2 will need to be built
EmbedTool will need to be built
{$NAME} DISCS=discs/master_discs.txt ROMS=roms/master_roms.txt
Configured master TUBE=0 DEBUGGER=0 SID= PICO_CPU=1 GUI= SAVE= VDFS=0 FDI= UEF= CSW= IDE= SCSI= ADC= MOUSE= MUSIC5000= I8271=
{$NAME} DISCS=discs/beeb_discs.txt ROMS=roms/beeb_roms.txt
Configured beeb_1080p TUBE=0 DEBUGGER=0 SID= PICO_CPU=1 GUI= SAVE= VDFS=0 FDI= UEF= CSW= IDE= SCSI= ADC= MOUSE= MUSIC5000= I8271=
WEEVAL beeb_1080p
{$NAME} DISCS=discs/master_discs.txt ROMS=roms/master_roms.txt
Configured master_1080p TUBE=0 DEBUGGER=0 SID= PICO_CPU=1 GUI= SAVE= VDFS=0 FDI= UEF= CSW= IDE= SCSI= ADC= MOUSE= MUSIC5000= I8271=
WEEVAL master_1080p
{$NAME} DISCS=discs/beeb_discs.txt ROMS=roms/beeb_roms.txt
Configured beeb_360 TUBE=0 DEBUGGER=0 SID= PICO_CPU=1 GUI= SAVE= VDFS=0 FDI= UEF= CSW= IDE= SCSI= ADC= MOUSE= MUSIC5000= I8271=
{$NAME} DISCS=discs/master_discs.txt ROMS=roms/master_roms.txt
Configured master_360 TUBE=0 DEBUGGER=0 SID= PICO_CPU=1 GUI= SAVE= VDFS=0 FDI= UEF= CSW= IDE= SCSI= ADC= MOUSE= MUSIC5000= I8271=
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have been written to: /home/pi/PiPico/pico_build
However make -j4 doesn't work

Code: Select all

pi@raspberrypi:~/PiPico/pico_build $ make -j4
[  1%] Performing build step for 'PioasmBuild'
[  2%] Performing build step for 'EmbedToolBuild'
[  2%] Built target slower_boot2
[  2%] Built target bs2_default
[  3%] Performing build step for 'ELF2UF2Build'
[  3%] Built target asmstuff
[100%] Built target pioasm
[  4%] Built target slower_boot2_padded_checksummed_asm
[ 33%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/embed_tool.dir/main.cpp.o
[  4%] No install step for 'PioasmBuild'
[  5%] Built target bs2_default_padded_checksummed_asm
[ 50%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/elf2uf2.dir/main.cpp.o
[  5%] Completed 'PioasmBuild'
[  5%] Built target PioasmBuild
[  5%] Built target pico_audio_i2s_audio_i2s_pio_h
[  5%] Built target pico_scanvideo_scanvideo_pio_h
/home/pi/PiPico/b-em/src/pico/embed_tool/main.cpp:11:22: fatal error: filesystem: No such file or directory
 #include <filesystem>
                      ^
compilation terminated.
[  5%] Built target pico_gui_menu_pio_h
[  6%] Built target pico_scanvideo_dpi_timing_pio_h
CMakeFiles/embed_tool.dir/build.make:62: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/embed_tool.dir/main.cpp.o' failed
make[5]: *** [CMakeFiles/embed_tool.dir/main.cpp.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:72: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/embed_tool.dir/all' failed
make[4]: *** [CMakeFiles/embed_tool.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
src/pico/CMakeFiles/EmbedToolBuild.dir/build.make:110: recipe for target 'src/pico/embed_tool/src/EmbedToolBuild-stamp/EmbedToolBuild-build' failed
make[2]: *** [src/pico/embed_tool/src/EmbedToolBuild-stamp/EmbedToolBuild-build] Error 2
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:2440: recipe for target 'src/pico/CMakeFiles/EmbedToolBuild.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [src/pico/CMakeFiles/EmbedToolBuild.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:55:10: error: invalid use of non-static data member ‘address_range::type’
     type type;
          ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:70:58: error: from this location
     address_range(FLASH_START, FLASH_END, address_range::type::CONTENTS),
                                                          ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:55:10: error: invalid use of non-static data member ‘address_range::type’
     type type;
          ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:71:64: error: from this location
     address_range(MAIN_RAM_START, MAIN_RAM_END, address_range::type::NO_CONTENTS)
                                                                ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:72:1: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::vector<address_range>::vector(<brace-enclosed initializer list>)’
 };
 ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:72:1: note: candidates are:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/vector:64:0,
                 from /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:9:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:401:9: note: template<class _InputIterator, class> std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, const allocator_type&)
         vector(_InputIterator __first, _InputIterator __last,
         ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:401:9: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:373:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::initializer_list<_Tp>, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(initializer_list<value_type> __l,
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:373:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘<type error>’ to ‘std::initializer_list<address_range>’
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:348:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(vector&& __rv, const allocator_type& __m)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:348:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘<type error>’ to ‘std::vector<address_range>&&’
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:339:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(const vector& __x, const allocator_type& __a)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:339:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘<type error>’ to ‘const std::vector<address_range>&’
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:335:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(vector&& __x) noexcept
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:335:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:318:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(const vector& __x)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:318:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:289:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type, const value_type&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type = unsigned int; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::value_type = address_range; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(size_type __n, const value_type& __value,
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:289:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘<type error>’ to ‘std::vector<address_range>::size_type {aka unsigned int}’
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:277:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type = unsigned int; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(size_type __n, const allocator_type& __a = allocator_type())
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:277:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘<type error>’ to ‘std::vector<address_range>::size_type {aka unsigned int}’
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:264:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(const allocator_type& __a) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:264:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:253:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector() [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector()
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:253:7: note:   candidate expects 0 arguments, 2 provided
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:55:10: error: invalid use of non-static data member ‘address_range::type’
     type type;
          ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:75:64: error: from this location
     address_range(MAIN_RAM_START, MAIN_RAM_END, address_range::type::CONTENTS),
                                                                ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:55:10: error: invalid use of non-static data member ‘address_range::type’
     type type;
          ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:76:64: error: from this location
     address_range(XIP_SRAM_START, XIP_SRAM_END, address_range::type::CONTENTS),
                                                                ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:55:10: error: invalid use of non-static data member ‘address_range::type’
     type type;
          ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:77:60: error: from this location
     address_range(0x00000000u, 0x00004000u, address_range::type::IGNORE) // for now we ignore the bootrom if present
                                                            ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:78:1: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::vector<address_range>::vector(<brace-enclosed initializer list>)’
 };
 ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:78:1: note: candidates are:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/vector:64:0,
                 from /home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:9:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:401:9: note: template<class _InputIterator, class> std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, const allocator_type&)
         vector(_InputIterator __first, _InputIterator __last,
         ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:401:9: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:373:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::initializer_list<_Tp>, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(initializer_list<value_type> __l,
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:373:7: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 3 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:348:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(vector&& __rv, const allocator_type& __m)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:348:7: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 3 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:339:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(const vector& __x, const allocator_type& __a)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:339:7: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 3 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:335:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(vector&& __x) noexcept
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:335:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 3 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:318:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(const vector& __x)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:318:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 3 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:289:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type, const value_type&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type = unsigned int; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::value_type = address_range; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(size_type __n, const value_type& __value,
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:289:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘<type error>’ to ‘std::vector<address_range>::size_type {aka unsigned int}’
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:277:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type = unsigned int; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(size_type __n, const allocator_type& __a = allocator_type())
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:277:7: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 3 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:264:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector(const allocator_type& __a) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:264:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 3 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:253:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector() [with _Tp = address_range; _Alloc = std::allocator<address_range>]
       vector()
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:253:7: note:   candidate expects 0 arguments, 3 provided
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp: In function ‘int check_address_range(const address_ranges&, uint32_t, uint32_t, uint32_t, bool, address_range&)’:
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:123:46: error: ‘address_range::type’ is not a class, namespace, or enumeration
             if (range.type == address_range::type::NO_CONTENTS && !uninitialized) {
                                              ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp: In function ‘int read_and_check_elf32_ph_entries(FILE*, const elf32_header&, const address_ranges&, std::map<unsigned int, std::vector<page_fragment> >&)’:
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:156:51: error: ‘address_range::type’ is not a class, namespace, or enumeration
                     if (ar.type != address_range::type::CONTENTS) {
                                                   ^
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp: In function ‘bool is_address_initialized(const address_ranges&, uint32_t)’:
/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/tools/elf2uf2/main.cpp:221:35: error: ‘address_range::type’ is not a class, namespace, or enumeration
             return address_range::type::CONTENTS == range.type;
                                   ^
CMakeFiles/elf2uf2.dir/build.make:62: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/elf2uf2.dir/main.cpp.o' failed
make[5]: *** [CMakeFiles/elf2uf2.dir/main.cpp.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:72: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/elf2uf2.dir/all' failed
make[4]: *** [CMakeFiles/elf2uf2.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
src/pico/CMakeFiles/ELF2UF2Build.dir/build.make:110: recipe for target 'src/pico/elf2uf2/src/ELF2UF2Build-stamp/ELF2UF2Build-build' failed
make[2]: *** [src/pico/elf2uf2/src/ELF2UF2Build-stamp/ELF2UF2Build-build] Error 2
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:2995: recipe for target 'src/pico/CMakeFiles/ELF2UF2Build.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [src/pico/CMakeFiles/ELF2UF2Build.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

Is it picking up the wrong tools?
Last edited by anightin on Wed Mar 10, 2021 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

it looks like your gcc is not up to date - you need at least gcc 8
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

kilog wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 1:36 am it looks like your gcc is not up to date - you need at least gcc 8
Thanks Graham, that would probably do it!

Code: Select all

pi@raspberrypi:~ $ gcc --version
gcc (Raspbian 4.9.3-14) 4.9.3
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
... Update
Found https://bitbucket.org/sol_prog/raspberr ... .0.tar.bz2

sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /opt/gcc-8.1.0/bin/gcc-8.1.0 8
sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/c++ c++ /opt/gcc-8.1.0/bin/c++-8.1.0 8
pi@raspberrypi:/usr/bin $ sudo update-alternatives --config gcc
There are 2 choices for the alternative gcc (providing /usr/bin/gcc).

Selection Path Priority Status
------------------------------------------------------------
0 /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 60 auto mode
* 1 /opt/gcc-8.1.0/bin/gcc-8.1.0 8 manual mode
2 /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 60 manual mode

Press <enter> to keep the current choice[*], or type selection number:

Code: Select all

[ 98%] Built target master_1080p
[ 98%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/lib/tinyusb/src/class/hid/hid_host.c.obj
[ 99%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/lib/tinyusb/src/class/msc/msc_host.c.obj
[ 99%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/lib/tinyusb/src/class/vendor/vendor_host.c.obj
[ 99%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/lib/tinyusb/src/tusb.c.obj
[ 99%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/lib/tinyusb/src/common/tusb_fifo.c.obj
[ 99%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-extras/src/rp2_common/pico_scanvideo_dpi/scanvideo.c.obj
[ 99%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/src/rp2_common/hardware_dma/dma.c.obj
[ 99%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/src/rp2_common/hardware_pio/pio.c.obj
[ 99%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-extras/src/common/pico_scanvideo/vga_modes.c.obj
[100%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-extras/src/common/pico_util_buffer/buffer.c.obj
[100%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-extras/src/rp2_common/pico_audio_i2s/audio_i2s.c.obj
[100%] Building CXX object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-extras/src/common/pico_audio/audio.cpp.obj
[100%] Building ASM object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-extras/src/common/pico_audio/audio_utils.S.obj
[100%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/home/pi/PiPico/pico-sdk/src/rp2_common/pico_multicore/multicore.c.obj
[100%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/sector_read/sector_read.c.obj
[100%] Building C object src/pico/CMakeFiles/master_360.dir/sector_read/xip_stream.c.obj
[100%] Linking CXX executable master_360.elf
[100%] Built target master_360

Wow! That was an education [-o<

Code: Select all

 ls src/pico/*.uf2
src/pico/beeb_1080p.uf2  src/pico/beeb.uf2          src/pico/master_360.uf2
src/pico/beeb_360.uf2    src/pico/master_1080p.uf2  src/pico/master.uf2
8)
User avatar
scruss
Posts: 653
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 4:12 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by scruss »

anightin wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:07 pm Just trying to build on the RP2040 version on my Pi (Stretch) but CMake seems to be an old one
Stretch fell off security updates in June 2020. Everything around Raspberry Pi assumes you have the latest version, which has been Buster for more than a year
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

scruss wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 5:54 pm
anightin wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:07 pm Just trying to build on the RP2040 version on my Pi (Stretch) but CMake seems to be an old one
Stretch fell off security updates in June 2020. Everything around Raspberry Pi assumes you have the latest version, which has been Buster for more than a year
Yeah, my Pi OS is quite out of date, and is on the TODO list to migrate and update it.

The output through an OSSC looks fantastic using the 1080p uf2, very stable. The issue is that it adds a horizontal offset that I need to fix at some point.
IMG_8856.jpeg
IMG_8857.jpeg
master_1080p.uf2.zip
(1.18 MiB) Downloaded 109 times
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

interesting... i just pushed new code which has perhaps better support for 1080p (and i cut the flash speed in half so ppl shouldn't have problems with that if they were going to). I have no idea why you'd get a 1080p mode bunched up on the left. I think the problem you'd more likely hit is that now your monitor recognizes it as a widescreen mode, making to look stretched ...

... and so the new 1080p releases have a "widescreen" option in the menu to toggle between full width and 2/3 width.
noggin
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by noggin »

anightin wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 6:06 pm
scruss wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 5:54 pm
anightin wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:07 pm Just trying to build on the RP2040 version on my Pi (Stretch) but CMake seems to be an old one
Stretch fell off security updates in June 2020. Everything around Raspberry Pi assumes you have the latest version, which has been Buster for more than a year
Yeah, my Pi OS is quite out of date, and is on the TODO list to migrate and update it.

The output through an OSSC looks fantastic using the 1080p uf2, very stable. The issue is that it adds a horizontal offset that I need to fix at some point.

master_1080p.uf2.zip
Using my various VGA adaptors with that build, the ones that worked well previously work even better now. I get a signal reported by my HD Fury Vertex HDMI analyser that is recognised as 1080p50.

I get what appears to be a bit-wider-than 4:3 but not as wide as 16:9. This is output as a 16:9 signal (as 1080p50 HDMI is 16:9) The BBC Micro output appears on the left-of frame - VERY tight to the top left - but with a large gap to the right of frame, and a smaller gap at the bottom of frame.

My flat panel is in no-overscan mode - but if your flat panel simulated overscan - as many do by default - you'd have some crop on the left and top as it's VERY snug top left.
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

noggin wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:31 am
anightin wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 6:06 pm
scruss wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 5:54 pm
Stretch fell off security updates in June 2020. Everything around Raspberry Pi assumes you have the latest version, which has been Buster for more than a year
Yeah, my Pi OS is quite out of date, and is on the TODO list to migrate and update it.

The output through an OSSC looks fantastic using the 1080p uf2, very stable. The issue is that it adds a horizontal offset that I need to fix at some point.

master_1080p.uf2.zip
Using my various VGA adaptors with that build, the ones that worked well previously work even better now. I get a signal reported by my HD Fury Vertex HDMI analyser that is recognised as 1080p50.

I get what appears to be a bit-wider-than 4:3 but not as wide as 16:9. This is output as a 16:9 signal (as 1080p50 HDMI is 16:9) The BBC Micro output appears on the left-of frame - VERY tight to the top left - but with a large gap to the right of frame, and a smaller gap at the bottom of frame.

My flat panel is in no-overscan mode - but if your flat panel simulated overscan - as many do by default - you'd have some crop on the left and top as it's VERY snug top left.
Good to know. I've just got around to updating my Pi now to Buster, so the build runs nicely without any messing about with gcc versions etc. I was holding off as I have a number of Python pip3 installs to run heating and lights at home and didn't want to end up breaking everything.

Anyhow, I've ordered one one of these:

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/VGA-to-HDMI- ... 3144855260

... after two failed attempts at trying to order one from Amazon, and another from e-bay.

The Amazon link was:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/LEYMING-Conver ... ics&sr=1-1

The eBay link was:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/LEYMING-VGA- ... 4902.l9144


In both cases they sent me one of these HDMI to VGA adapters instead! :roll:
IMG_8862.jpeg
Buyer's beware!

I noticed that they both had VGA to HDMI adapter written on the back of the packet which is where I'm guessing the issue crept in #-o


If my latest purchase doesn't work out I'd appreciate a link to one that will deliver as specified [-o<

BR

Andy
noggin
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by noggin »

Here's a screen cap from a £10 HDMI->USB adaptor that illustrates what I see with my VGA->HDMI adaptor in 1080p50 mode. The Green OSD is the HD Fury Vertex overlay.

I used EDIT as it is a nice 'fills the screen' example.
Attachments
Screen Cap.png
Last edited by noggin on Tue Mar 16, 2021 11:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
noggin
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by noggin »

anightin wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:58 am If my latest purchase doesn't work out I'd appreciate a link to one that will deliver as specified
Here's my links from the other thread this was split from viewtopic.php?p=311632#p311632

All of them were VGA->HDMI adaptors - but only some work well with the output from Pico at the moment.
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

noggin wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 11:14 am Here's a screen cap from a £10 HDMI->USB adaptor that illustrates what I see with my VGA->HDMI adaptor in 1080p50 mode. The Green OSD is the HD Fury Vertex overlay.

I used EDIT as it is a nice 'fills the screen' example.

I get what appears to be a bit-wider-than 4:3 but not as wide as 16:9. This is output as a 16:9 signal (as 1080p50 HDMI is 16:9) The BBC Micro output appears on the left-of frame - VERY tight to the top left - but with a large gap to the right of frame, and a smaller gap at the bottom of frame.
That is super weird... i mean it should be a standard mode! if you use the new "widescreen" menu option does it just shrink within the same sub-part of the display?

For amusement you could try replacing line 1599 src/rp2_common/pico_scanvideo_dpi/scanvideo.c in pico_extras

Code: Select all

    int delay0 = 2 * mode->xscale - 2;
with

Code: Select all

   int delay0 = 5;
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

I guess you could forgive the adapter if it doesn't know about the mode. since the "official" 1080p50 timing is the same as 1080p60 but with extra long scanlines to take up the slack
noggin
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by noggin »

kilog wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 6:50 pm I guess you could forgive the adapter if it doesn't know about the mode. since the "official" 1080p50 timing is the same as 1080p60 but with extra long scanlines to take up the slack
That's the official HDMI 1080p50 timing isn't it - not a VGA one (which I guess doesn't exist?)
noggin
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by noggin »

kilog wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 6:47 pm
noggin wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 11:14 am Here's a screen cap from a £10 HDMI->USB adaptor that illustrates what I see with my VGA->HDMI adaptor in 1080p50 mode. The Green OSD is the HD Fury Vertex overlay.

I used EDIT as it is a nice 'fills the screen' example.

I get what appears to be a bit-wider-than 4:3 but not as wide as 16:9. This is output as a 16:9 signal (as 1080p50 HDMI is 16:9) The BBC Micro output appears on the left-of frame - VERY tight to the top left - but with a large gap to the right of frame, and a smaller gap at the bottom of frame.
That is super weird... i mean it should be a standard mode! if you use the new "widescreen" menu option does it just shrink within the same sub-part of the display?

For amusement you could try replacing line 1599 src/rp2_common/pico_scanvideo_dpi/scanvideo.c in pico_extras

Code: Select all

    int delay0 = 2 * mode->xscale - 2;
with

Code: Select all

   int delay0 = 5;
I'm using the image from this post - I don't have a build environment set-up yet.
viewtopic.php?p=312362#p312362
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

noggin wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:35 am
kilog wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 6:47 pm
noggin wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 11:14 am Here's a screen cap from a £10 HDMI->USB adaptor that illustrates what I see with my VGA->HDMI adaptor in 1080p50 mode. The Green OSD is the HD Fury Vertex overlay.

I used EDIT as it is a nice 'fills the screen' example.

I get what appears to be a bit-wider-than 4:3 but not as wide as 16:9. This is output as a 16:9 signal (as 1080p50 HDMI is 16:9) The BBC Micro output appears on the left-of frame - VERY tight to the top left - but with a large gap to the right of frame, and a smaller gap at the bottom of frame.
That is super weird... i mean it should be a standard mode! if you use the new "widescreen" menu option does it just shrink within the same sub-part of the display?

For amusement you could try replacing line 1599 src/rp2_common/pico_scanvideo_dpi/scanvideo.c in pico_extras

Code: Select all

    int delay0 = 2 * mode->xscale - 2;
with

Code: Select all

   int delay0 = 5;
I'm using the image from this post - I don't have a build environment set-up yet.
viewtopic.php?p=312362#p312362
Here you go...
master_1080p_delay0_eq_5.uf2.zip
(1.18 MiB) Downloaded 73 times
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

noggin wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:34 am
kilog wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 6:50 pm I guess you could forgive the adapter if it doesn't know about the mode. since the "official" 1080p50 timing is the same as 1080p60 but with extra long scanlines to take up the slack
That's the official HDMI 1080p50 timing isn't it - not a VGA one (which I guess doesn't exist?)
true; i can try making up a VESA compatible 1080p 50 timing and see if that works!
happycube
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 3:52 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by happycube »

I was able to use a generic VGA->HDMI digitizer (USB powered, 'benifi' brand) and my Dell P2715Q (27" 4K) was able to sync up to 1280x1024@50hz just fine. It even has a 4:3 aspect ratio option.

Link to it on Amazon US: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07K14NR8P
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

kilog wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 6:47 pm
For amusement you could try replacing line 1599 src/rp2_common/pico_scanvideo_dpi/scanvideo.c in pico_extras
Using my new Amazon generic VGA to HDMI converter as suggested by @noggin:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B07 ... UTF8&psc=1

I get:

Code: Select all

    int delay0 = 2 * mode->xscale - 2;
IMG_8878.jpeg
and

with

Code: Select all

   int delay0 = 5;
IMG_8877.jpeg

... so the suggested mod works better on my setup IMHO in that the image fills the screen more. There is still a slight border on the right and bottom.
noggin
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by noggin »

happycube wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 5:03 pm I was able to use a generic VGA->HDMI digitizer (USB powered, 'benifi' brand) and my Dell P2715Q (27" 4K) was able to sync up to 1280x1024@50hz just fine. It even has a 4:3 aspect ratio option.

Link to it on Amazon US: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07K14NR8P
Looks like there is one of those on UK Amazon too. Have ordered it to see how it compares to the others I have. (Thankfully I have other uses for some of these converters!)
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

anightin wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:53 pm
... so the suggested mod works better on my setup IMHO in that the image fills the screen more. There is still a slight border on the right and bottom.
Yup; this is just a complete hack to see what happens (it will break your menu for example as you have likely noticed)... bit busy atm, but will have a tinker with other (valid according to CVT1.2) modes in a bit.
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

kilog wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 4:54 pm
anightin wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:53 pm
... so the suggested mod works better on my setup IMHO in that the image fills the screen more. There is still a slight border on the right and bottom.
Yup; this is just a complete hack to see what happens (it will break your menu for example as you have likely noticed)... bit busy atm, but will have a tinker with other (valid according to CVT1.2) modes in a bit.
Sure, happy to try anything else, as and when. The main feedback from me so far is that the image has no border left and top either way.
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

anightin wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 5:15 pm Sure, happy to try anything else, as and when. The main feedback from me so far is that the image has no border left and top either way.
Ah - there is not supposed to be any border!
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

kilog wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:29 am
anightin wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 5:15 pm Sure, happy to try anything else, as and when. The main feedback from me so far is that the image has no border left and top either way.
Ah - there is not supposed to be any border!
In that case I'll modify my feedback to say that there is right and bottom border on my widescreen display, with the hack reducing some of the right hand border :D
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

... just to add to the adapter list, this one works perfectly too:

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/VGA-to-HDMI- ... 2749.l2649
kilog
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:58 am
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by kilog »

anightin wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 10:35 am
kilog wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:29 am
anightin wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 5:15 pm Sure, happy to try anything else, as and when. The main feedback from me so far is that the image has no border left and top either way.
Ah - there is not supposed to be any border!
In that case I'll modify my feedback to say that there is right and bottom border on my widescreen display, with the hack reducing some of the right hand border :D
Yeah, i think it will like another mode better with a smaller horizontal total. does it show show what it thinks the mode is resolution wise in the menu anywhere?
User avatar
anightin
Posts: 970
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:03 pm
Location: Cambridge UK
Contact:

Re: RP2040/Pico beeb emulator

Post by anightin »

kilog wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:12 am
anightin wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 10:35 am
kilog wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:29 am

Ah - there is not supposed to be any border!
In that case I'll modify my feedback to say that there is right and bottom border on my widescreen display, with the hack reducing some of the right hand border :D
Yeah, i think it will like another mode better with a smaller horizontal total. does it show show what it thinks the mode is resolution wise in the menu anywhere?
I seem to remember 1125p showing up on my OSSC but now I can feed it direct into my monitor with the VGA adapter I'll take a look when I'm next in the workshop and post back.
Post Reply

Return to “8-bit acorn emulators”